|
Home | Corson
Collection | Biography | Works | Image
Collection | Recent
Publications | Portraits | Correspondence | Forthcoming
Events | Links | E-Texts | Contact
Kenilworth
First Edition, First Impression:
Kenilworth; A Romance. By the Author of "Waverley". In
Three Volumes. Vol. I (II-III). Edinburgh: Printed for Archibald
Constable and Co.; And John Ballantyne, Edinburgh; And Hurst, Robinson,
and Co., London, 1821.
Composition |
Sources | Synopsis | Reception | Links
Composition
There is little surviving evidence regarding the
genesis of Kenilworth. Recent biographers and editors
have largely accepted the account given by Scott's son-in-law J.
G. Lockhart in his Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott,
Bart. (1837-38). According to Lockhart, Scott's regular publisher
Archibald Constable wrote to suggest that, after portraying Mary
Queen of Scots in The Abbot,
Scott depict her nemesis Elizabeth I of England in his next novel.
Scott may well have wished to propitiate Constable, having chosen
the London firm of Longmans to manage the publication of The
Monastery and The Abbot. He took up Constable's
suggestion but not, however, the additional hint that the novel
be entitled The Armada and focus on the attempted Spanish
invasion. He based the plot instead around the alleged murder of
Amy Robsart, first wife of the Earl of Leicester, a story which
he had first encountered in a favourite ballad of his childhood,
William Julius Mickle's 'Cumnor Hall' (1784). Cumnor Hall was
to be the original title of the novel but, according to Lockhart,
Scott bowed to pressure from Constable and accepted his publisher's
suggestion of Kenilworth. Constable's influence did not
stop here. His bibliographical knowledge proved invaluable in providing
Scott with an extensive list of background reading. So proud was
Constable of his contribution to Kenilworth that, according
to his partner Robert Cadell, he was given to exclaiming, 'By G--,
I am all but the author of the Waverley Novels!'
The letter containing Constable's original suggestion
is lost but must have reached Scott in late December 1819 or early
January 1820. A letter from Scott apparently acknowledging the
suggestion is dated 12 January 1820. A contract for the new novel
was signed as early as 18 January, even though Scott was still
working on The Monastery and had yet to begin The
Abbot. The new novel was originally scheduled to be published
in late June 1820, but Scott did not complete The Abbot until
August. He demanded a few weeks breathing space before starting
work on Kenilworth in September. As the novel was complete
by 27 December, however, it seems likely that Scott had previously
engaged in extensive mental elaboration of the plot. Printing was
complete by 5 January 1821 and the novel was published on 15 January
in Edinburgh and 18 January in London.
The novel was published by Constable in partnership
with the London firm of Hurst, Robinson, and Co. Negotiations between
Constable and Longmans, originally designated as co-publisher,
had broken down in October 1820. The association between Hurst,
Robinson, and Co. and Constable would prove an unhappy one for
Scott. The former's reckless involvement in speculation in 1825
would lead to Constable's bankruptcy and to Scott's own crippling
insolvency in 1826 (see Financial
Hardship).
Back to top Sources
Scott had attained extensive familiarity with Elizabethan
source material while preparing scholarly editions of The Memoirs
of Robert Cary, Earl of Monmouth, Sir Robert Naunton's Fragmenta
Regalia (both 1808) the Somers Tracts (1809-15),
and Samuel Rowlands's The Letting of Humours Blood (1814).
In addition, for the entertainment of Queen Elizabeth at Kenilworth,
he drew on Robert Laneham or Langham's undated and anonymous A
Letter and George Gascoigne's Palace of Princely Pleasures,
both of which he would have found in John Nichols's The Progresses
and Public Processions of Queen Elizabeth (1788). Scott consulted
William Dugdale's Antiquities of Warwickshire (1656) for
a detailed plan of Kenilworth Castle, which he had also visited,
in its partially ruined state, on his way back from France in 1815.
For the tale of Amy Robsart and Cumnor Hall, he drew on Elias Ashmole's Antiquities
of Berkshire (1719). Again, however, literary sources proved
as influential as the historical archives. For both plot and period
language, Scott owed an extensive debt to Elizabeth and Jacobean
drama, particularly Shakespeare's Macbeth and Othello.
Back to top

Synopsis
The heroine Amy Robsart enters into a secret marriage
with the Earl of Leicester, spurning her fiancé, Edmund Tressilian,
a Cornish gentleman. A favourite of Queen Elizabeth, Leicester feels
obliged to conceal his marriage in order to maintain his position
at court. Having fled her father's house, Amy is therefore kept
a virtual prisoner in Cumnor Place, an old country house. Tressilian
believes that Amy has been abducted by Leicester's Master of the
Horse, Varney, whom Leicester has used as a mask for his own amorous
intrigues. With the backing of Amy's distraught father, Sir Hugh,
Tressilian accuses Varney before the Queen of unlawful seduction.
In order to protect his patron, Varney swears that Amy is his wife.
Not altogether convinced, the Queen orders Varney to produce Amy
in that capacity during the projected revels at Leicester's castle
of Kenilworth. When Amy indignantly refuses to play this role, Varney
has poisons administered, which will provoke a mild illness and
thus excuse her absence. Amy, though, thwarts Varney's plan with
the assistance of Tressilian's page Wayland Smith and makes her
way to Kenilworth. Here, before she can make her husband aware of
her presence, she comes face to face with the Queen and appeals
for her aid against Varney. As she cannot bring herself to declare
her marriage to Leicester against her husband's wishes, the Queen
thinks her mad and consigns her, eventually, to Varney's care. Varney,
who sees in Amy an obstacle to his own ambition, persuades his patron
that she is having an affair with Tressilian, and the jealous Leicester
orders him to put her to death. Varney leaves Kenilworth with Amy
in order to carry out the murder at Cumnor Place. A messenger sent
to countermand the order, when Leicester has second thoughts, is
brutally killed. Back at Kenilworth, Tressilian, who is ignorant
of Amy's fate, makes a personal appeal to Leicester. Incensed, Leicester
challenges him to a duel and is on the point of killing him, when
the arrival of a delayed letter from Amy convinces him that Varney's
accusations are false. Leicester confesses her marriage to Elizabeth
who dispatches Tressilian to Cumnor Place to rescue Amy. He arrives
at the moment that Varney has engineered her death through a fall.
Varney is arrested and poisons himself in his prison cell; the heart-broken
Tressilian enlists on the Virginia expedition and dies an early
death; Leicester regains his privileged position at court after
a brief period of disgrace.
Back to top

Reception
Kenilworth was an immediate success with both
readers and critics. The Edinburgh Review praised Scott
for bringing to life the character of Queen Elizabeth 'with the
most brilliant and seducing effect'. The Quarterly declared
that, while Scott's portrayal of Elizabeth did not quite live up
to that of Mary in The Abbot, she
was still a 'vivid and magnificent' character. As Scott had feared,
however, the Quarterly along with the Gentleman's Magazine,
thought the ending too tragic. The only serious adverse criticism
came from the British Review which judged the novel 'a tedious
performance' composed 'in a spirit of bookmaking'. Such, however,
was the public response to the novel that sightseers flocked to
Cumnor where the parish clerk made a small fortune out of showing
visitors round the site of Cumnor Place. Lord Abingdon was widely
criticized for having torn down the old mansion in 1810.
Back to top
Links
Back to top
Back to Index of Works
Last updated: 20-July-2012
© Edinburgh University Library
|
|